Steven Lab: Crime Prevention, 7th Edition


Case Studies with Questions and Answers

Chapter 05: Neighborhood Crime Prevention

Jessica Taylor, a nurse in a mid-sized southeast city, works 10 hours shifts Monday-Thursday and sometimes more, but spends Friday-Sunday catching up with her family. Her husband, a professor at a nearby university, spends most of his day at the office Monday-Friday. The neighborhood the couple resides in, Seagate Village, is an average middle class neighborhood. The couple lives in a rather nice, 3 bedroom, two story house, and the neighborhood is similar in size and appearance.

Starting this past summer the neighbors have been noticing small items have been missing from vehicles and garages. These items include rakes, leaf blowers, weed eaters, and other lawn maintenance, and home improvement tools. Beginning this December, Mr. Bella, a neighbor from 4 doors down, had his vehicle broken into and several items stolen. A fellow neighbor, Mrs. Faulkner, witnessed the act and called the police with the description of 3 teenage boys, 2 white, 1 black, running from the scene.

Mrs. Taylor has spent the last 3 months gathering signed petitions for the start of a neighborhood crime watch community in hopes of having the community watch program sponsored by the state. Of the 34 houses in the neighborhood, she has gained support from 27 of these houses, all whom reported they will actively participate. With no businesses in the community, Mrs. Taylor is limited to gaining the signatures of residents only to get a better understand of the desire of the community to participate.

Questions

  1. Based on the above scenario, what options do the neighbors of Seagate Village have to prevent crime?
  2. Correct Answer

    Neighborhood watch appears the most plausible answer for the scenario. Based on the fact that the crime is occurring in a residential area, with no known businesses to attract outsiders, and the perpetrators are assumed teenage boys, neighborhood watch, access control, surveillability, and simply program awareness to the would-be criminals is the best approach. It is free and may be a deterrent


  3. What are some problems Mrs. Taylor will have in getting her program started?
  4. Correct Answer

    According to Rosenbaum's assumptions (pg. 101), Mrs. Taylor can assume once this program is accepted, that many of those 80% of the neighboring citizens who said they would participate most likely will not. In addition, if the fear of crime is not increased in the community, many may see a neighborhood watch as useless because the crime is not violent in nature or "serious" enough to warrant giving free time up during the week/weekends to participate.

  5. What are some problems Mrs. Taylor will have once the program begins?
  6. Correct Answer

    Once the program begins, two obvious issues arise. 1) participation will slowly begin to dwindle if the proactive nature of neighborhood watch deters crime in the area and participates feel their efforts are futile 2) with teenagers as the most likely culprits, the crimes may be a "acting out" or an act of trying to improve their "status" in the group. There is nothing in the literature that supports implementing one solitary program will prevent crime or fear of crime for that matter in a given area. Therefore, participation may struggle.

Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.