William E. Dyson: Terrorism


Case Studies with Questions and Answers

Chapter 11: Informants

In 2004 Shahawar Matin Siraj, a Pakistani American who planned to bomb the Herald Square of Manhattan, NY was found guilty of plotting to commit a terrorist act. His apprehension was accredited to an informant by the name of Osama Eldawoody, a fellow Muslim. Eldawoody had been working along-side NYPD investigators to unveil Siraj's attempt.

The trial received significant attention from local media outlets due to the Siraj's defense, entrapment. According to Siraj, Eldawoody had provoked Siraj into committing a crime against American citizens and felt that had it not been for Eldawoody the event never would have taken place. Allegations of Eldawoody editing his surveillance tapes to avoid any self-incrimination also came up during the trial.

Siraj was not successful in his defense and was eventually found guilty of four counts which included attempted bombings and conspiracy.

Questions

  1. What was the biggest issue in Siraj's case?
  2. Correct Answer

    The use of an informant.


  3. Would NYPD ever use Eldawoody again, why or why not?
  4. Correct Answer

    No. Not necessarily because of his credibility but because he's already been "made."


  5. Could this case have resulted in entrapment? What prevented it from ending in that result?
  6. Correct Answer

    Yes. The case presented by the prosecution and the investigator in charge of the case was more than sufficient evidence. Eldawoody's testimony was supplemental.


Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved.